View Single Post
Old 11-27-2016, 03:10 PM   #47
justatroll
Senior Member
 
justatroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: Full race 4cyl boxer
Location: CO, USA
Posts: 587
Thanks: 310
Thanked 510 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMPB View Post
You don't get it, and your analogy is wrong again, because it's saying that disabling the smoke detectors causes the fire.

Stance is not to blame. Racing is to blame.
Ok better analogy:
"Stancing" your car is like:

Making it unsafe for use on the streets because you have "handicapped", "impaired", or "hindered" the suspension from doing the job intended by the engineers.

Or does:
Lowering the car so that the suspension has little or no travel
Tilting the wheels so that they have little to no contact patch (or WORSE riding on the sidewall)

Make the car = MORE SAFE?

NO it clearly makes it less safe INTENTIONALLY!

So - intentionally making your car less safe, and potentially unstable, then driving it on the street is an accident waiting to happen.
(go ahead ANYONE try to argue that point).
So by making your car intentionally unstable then driving it in such a manner as to crash on the street - what is the cause???
MAKING THE CAR UNSTABLE!

It's like a pilot saying "I am going to land with my eyes closed" and then landing too hard and blowing a tire and spinning off the runway - THEN BLAMING THE TIRE!
You were a stupid motherfucker for trying that shit in the first place.

Or If I want to skateboard down a hill with a blindfold, then crash and blame
"speed" for the crash. - NO - you hindered your ability BEFORE trying dont blame the activity for your stupidity.
__________________
Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a Pig in the mud. You are never going to win and after a couple of hours you realize that he likes it.
justatroll is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to justatroll For This Useful Post:
humfrz (11-27-2016)