View Single Post
Old 11-14-2016, 04:03 PM   #34
PandaSPUR
PandaPandaPandaPandaPanda
 
PandaSPUR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2015 BRZ Limited CWP
Location: New York City, NY
Posts: 1,432
Thanks: 776
Thanked 697 Times in 438 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by justatroll View Post
Actually I think you COULD blame the stupid STANCE.
When you intentionally make the suspension in a car almost unuseable as the engineers intended, add some instability, compromise traction, then DRIVE ON The STREET, you should be held accountable for any accidents.
Wouldn't a person be held accountable if they thought "hey I think I want to put Teflon slicks on my car and take it out on the freeway" and then caused a major accident?
I would only blame stance here if it was the main factor. I.e. if another identical car was going down the same road at the same speed, but had stock suspension and wheels, would it have caused the same accident? If not, then yea blame stance.

Again, its like saying turbos are to blame for accidents because they cause our engines to produce more power than what the rest of the power train was designed for.

Last edited by PandaSPUR; 11-14-2016 at 04:18 PM.
PandaSPUR is offline   Reply With Quote