View Single Post
Old 11-09-2016, 04:17 PM   #32
DSLeach
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: None
Location: NC
Posts: 26
Thanks: 1
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by justatroll View Post
I was reading along thinking that the world has come to it's senses because nobody has suggested LWCP or LWFW, and there you go ruining it.

It is NOT POSSIBLE to get "more hp" by reducing the rotating mass of the engine or drivetrain.
It does not Make more HP or "free up" more HP.
Removing weight from the rotating mass will give you the exact same benefits as removing that same weight from anywhere else on the car.
Except by focusing your efforts on reducing rotating mass you will certainly see a huge decrease in the weight of your wallet.

The only noticeable change in "responsiveness" is throttle response when the car is out of gear.

Actually, less rotating mass (crank, flywheel, clutch, drive shaft, wheels, tires) or moving the mass inwards towards the center of rotation will free up HP parasitic losses. Here is a thought experiment for you.

Take one straight shaft and put a heavy truck wheel/tire on it. Lets say it is 300 lbs. Stand that axle straight up on with the wheel/tire on the top. Now imagine using your hands to spin that axle with the wheel/tire on the top. Its going to pretty hard because of the mass you are attempting to accelerate.

Try the same thought experiment with a little 12" trailer wheel/tire combination on the axle. Spinning that little wheel/tire combo is a lot easier because the mass is lower and because that small mass is concentrated closer to the center of rotation.

Remember the force required to accelerate a mass is governed by the equation F=ma. As the mass you are accelerating increases, so does the required force. This equation also applies to to rotational mass. Its just simple physics.

By the way, where did you get your engineering degree?

If you want some further education on the effective of rotating mass, there is a pretty good discussion of it in the suspension forum.

Cheers!
DSLeach is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DSLeach For This Useful Post:
brzd (11-09-2016), why? (12-01-2016)