View Single Post
Old 11-06-2016, 05:34 AM   #26
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,998 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luftwaffel View Post
Honestly I'm not holding my breath. I've been messing with OBD monitoring solutions for a really long time and I have yet to see a Bluetooth solution that doesn't lag.

TBH though, I don't need most of the things I'd display to be fully realtime. I do run a single multi gauge though for boost, AFR, and E% though, the stuff I'd want to be realtime. I'd run temps and FBKC and DAM on the app... a little delay in those wouldn't bother me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
The suggestion is that this will log faster than ProECU. Therefore no reason why you couldn't. Usually the reason why the BT devices lag is due to the fact that the OBD polling rate is slow.
Wouln,t it be more to do with most apps like torque dash command etc are using standard obd pid calls to ecu, where as stuff like ecutek oft tactrix are making direct ecu ram address reads which is way faster.

The data rate over blutooth should be heaps fast enough for some log data
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote