View Single Post
Old 10-31-2016, 08:07 PM   #3741
JDMChris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2016
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 280
Thanks: 51
Thanked 122 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to JDMChris
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reamer View Post
I was trying to decide between the two and I'm picking (haven't got it yet so take this with a grain of salt) the JRSC is because it is much lighter and the power band keeps the cars original characteristics instead of changing it entirely like I'm guessing the Edlebrock does with so much low end torque. Not that one is better than the other, purely preference.

Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
A big advantage is the JRSC's air to air Intercooler vs the Water to air Heat exchanger. The heat exchanger doesn't perform as well, so the water heats up, and the hotter it gets, the more power you lose. The Rotrex doesn't produce very much heat at all, and the air to air intercooler keeps cool air coming through, so you don't lose power like a roots. There are too many pro's of the JR kit to the others.
JDMChris is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JDMChris For This Useful Post:
funwheeldrive (11-01-2016), Reamer (10-31-2016), VABeachBRZ (11-01-2016)