View Single Post
Old 09-24-2016, 08:20 PM   #31
Th3rdSun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: 2013 FR-S MT Hot Lava
Location: Chicagoland Area
Posts: 594
Thanks: 156
Thanked 309 Times in 193 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerLieberman View Post
Explain where I'm contradicting myself.
"Adding AWD without adding weight is physically impossible. More parts = more weight. Only way they could make it AWD and not have the weight go up, is to cut weight elsewhere"

The way this statement reads is that it's impossible,but yeah,they can do it.Impossible,by definition means that there is no possible way for it to be accomplished.That's why I said that your statement was kind of contradictory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerLieberman View Post
I said the FR layout is an appropriate layout for the car. Then I mention that adding AWD adds complexity, cost, and weight in response to the comment prior about adding AWD but not adding weight.

You are assuming too much. The point is that at 62k, the GT350R is still competitively priced against Chevy, BMW, etc.

When you start increasing the price by 10-15k, it starts entering new territory in terms of competitor vehicles. I think most Mustang fans would prefer to keep the RWD layout and not pay $80,000 for a Mustang.
That's totally fair and I do agree for the most part,but damn would it be nice to see what an AWD model could do.Think of the Ken Block's '65 AWD Mustang.Of course that thing is heavily modded and meant for drifting,but it's still an AWD Mustang. I would just like to see what a production level AWD Shelby Cobra would offer to the world.Price be damned.

PS
Sorry if I came off sounding like I'm trying to start some internet war.Wasn't my intention.
Th3rdSun is offline   Reply With Quote