Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralle109
Yes it's a few Kilometer after.
Was Not to get acurate data, just for testing.
I'm relatively new in this area of working on cars.
Better for practice for me than only reading the hole time
|
I know the feeling of wanting to look straight away. And it doesn't hurt to look and see what the starting point is. Personally, I want to see as well, that the tune is not crazy looking for peace of mind and before putting a lot of km on it.
Just don't make too many conclusions or be too impatient and start making changes before you know where it will end up. I made that mistake more than once and in the end you will end up wasting your time making unnecessary changes or even counterproductive changes.
In any case, the tune looks fine for your car, nothing crazy in the log. So I wouldn't have any worries driving that for 2-300 km and check again.
One thing to keep an eye, later on, is what seems consistent -1.3 FLKC at load 0.6-0.7 at around 3300 rpm. Wait and see if it persists or if you will get any drop in IAM as a result. If it does, pull -0.7 timing in the cells closest to that in Base Timing B. At low rpm high FLKC is more likely to cause IAM to drop.
Personally, I would probably do that straight away to avoid having to go through the learning process once again. But I don't put that many km on my car so the learning is an issue for me.