View Single Post
Old 08-14-2016, 02:04 AM   #542
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tor View Post
So after 2 tries, I ended up with this below. I think it looks pretty good but would greatly appreciate if someone would take a look at it:

Closeup:
http://datazap.me/u/tor/tor-104-pull...5&zoom=554-682
With LTFT:
http://datazap.me/u/tor/tor-104-pull...5&zoom=550-688

My car has the shifts in fuel trims at 5000 rpm with every tune I flashed (including stock http://datazap.me/u/tor/stock-a00g-m...7&zoom=517-651 ).

Is it worth (and possible) getting rid of? I suppose that has to do with the injectors?
Injector scaling and the PI/DI ratio will have an effect in conjunction with your maf scale. Temperatures, fuel quality, and perhaps elevation will also have an effect where your fuel trims end up. Since the latter 3 is continuously variable, I think its best to just to dial your MAF scale under "average" conditions (eg intake air/engine operating temps, elevation etc.) for the least amount of LTFT and call it a day.

Other things you could do is try to match the PI scale to DI as close as you can, dial the MAF IAT compensation table, and change the CL switchover point to where the fuel trims are the most stable on your particular tune. Though, that is a shit ton of work for very little improvement in performance.

Again, it's probably best/safest to dial your maf scale and OL fuel table to where your car runs on target to slightly richer than target with least amount of fuel trims (+LTFT's) on average and call it a day. You much rather have it running too rich than too lean.
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.

Last edited by solidONE; 08-14-2016 at 02:17 AM.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to solidONE For This Useful Post:
Tor (08-14-2016)