View Single Post
Old 07-20-2016, 10:42 PM   #44
Summerwolf
Panda Trueno
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: No twin now.
Location: North Indiana
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 2,113
Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,332 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
2008 Mustang GT >3,450 lbs/300 HP = 11.5 lbs/HP
2003 Mustang GT >3300 lbs/260 hp = 12.69 lbs/hp
1998 Mustang GT >3300 lbs/225 HP = 14.67 lbs/hp
1993 Mustang GT >3160 lbs/205 hp = 15.41 lbs/hp

I thought we were talking about how you think modern V6 pony cars aren't enough power for your manly needs. Guess it's all subjective now...
They're not. You are missing quite a bit of factors with some of these cars. It isn't all as simple as power to weight. Torque, gearing, the powerband of certain motors you're showcasing here.... one dataset does not make the story of a full car. It was pretty well known most of the base gt mustangs were slouches though. The four cam and special versions were the fast ones out of the box. Those are mustangs though.... not sure how we got on to mustangs specifically lol.

For the record, the SVT cobra of 03-04 for comparison.

3665 lbs. 360 hp = 10.18 lbs / hp
Summerwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Summerwolf For This Useful Post:
mdm (07-21-2016), tyrantcf (07-22-2016)