View Single Post
Old 07-13-2016, 12:48 AM   #25
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeisterR View Post
Hello everyone,

Coming from the UK, I am just trying to get a general feel what community want from their suspension.
MeisterR suspension are design as multi-role suspension that does everything well.

For the FR-S / BRZ, we have the ZetaCRD+ Coilovers.
Springs rate specification are Front 5kg/mm, Rear 4kg/mm.

Our ZetaCRD are design for fast road & track use, and so the springs rate are design around compliancy over uneven road surfaces, while retaining damper adjustments for track use.

However, most enthusiast seems to engage with SCCA Auto Solo that require a slightly different setup than most track suspension.
We want to know do track enthusiast want dedicated setup that that is even stiffer to handle quick transition such as Auto Solo event, but give up compliancy for road use in return.

Let us know what you think, we are just taking in opinion at the moment.
Looking forward to hear from everyone.

Jerrick
I think your approach covers a large portion of the market. For myself, I'd sacrifice a little bit of compliance for better performance on track, but not so much where the ride under cruising speeds is jarring or too much unwanted oscillation. "Firm yet compliant" for cruising at the softest settings but formidable at a fast pace on a circuit at the firmer side using high performance street tires or even semi-slick tires. Is that asking for too much from a single adjustable damper? Or, do you think you've already achieved this result with your current product?
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote