Quote:
Originally Posted by dave-
Thanks for that, will flash your scale and do some more driving to gather additional data. Hopefully the weather doesn't change too much, but night is the only time I'll be able to avoid the traffic and it's getting cold (~10degC ambient) which isn't ideal. Need a temperature controlled dyno cell!
The Engine load table hasn't been altered from stock, doing a test run with the current data in the load rescale gives MP calc changes in the final 1.01 column only. Is that what I should expect once I have data from your revised scale?
Avoiding the open loop scenario isn't so easy! I looked at Wayno's thread, but didn't quite see how specifically to chase 3.2V in closed loop?
Also didn't think about Celsius vs Fahrenheit. And you were correct about the scale, it isn't the OEM one. I probably should have started there but it was supplied by someone familiar with the same turbo kit I have installed. Expected it to be close enough straight up but wasn't the case.
|
Depending on your CL/OL transition settings you may not get much higher MAFv ranges in closed loop, I wouldn't worry too much. I set the max to 5v just to see the data I'm getting. If you use the comparison button you can manually adjust the scale, I did that to compare yours to OEM to allow me to make it smoother.
What logging/tuning system are you using? If not ECUtek beware of differences in pressures between logging and the table definition. Not unusual for MRP/MAP or bar/psi. Sounds like the table is in MAP bar, how are you logging pressure? As ELC is just done in closed loop I rarely see changes made to the last column, but you should have many changes elsewhere.