Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@Nameless
You're looking at a dyno graph with the Forced Scaling shut off. If you'd like I can post yet another dyno graph with forced scaling on so that you can see that they both cross at the same point (ie scale on the torque graph on left fixed to the same scale as hp on the right).
Here is yet another graph for you. This is the last one I'm posting. If you think I'm fudging dyno data, don't buy my exhaust. Sad part is, I can make 20whp across the board just by telling the software that the dyno is in AWD mode and leaving the secondary set of rollers disconnected. And you would never be the wiser. Also, I can change the calibration data between pulls and do the same thing. Feasibly I could make whatever WHP I want to 'create' by doing this. Ask anyone who has bought our WRX or STi parts whether or not their gains were in the same range of our published dyno results and you'll see that we're an honest company who works hard to develop high quality, well designed and performing parts. It is in our best interest to operate with integrity.
Jason Griffith
Engineering Director
Nameless Performance, Inc. |
Don't take it personally, but as you know, that is one of the things to look for when evaluating posted dyno data. I was curious, I asked. It is something to be careful about in the future.
As you also know, dyno variability makes it a pain in the ass for customers to evaluate any data we see. If you go through some threads, you will note that I also question Perrin about their dyno operations. And in all honesty I am less satisfied with their response than yours, but am limited by a lack of knowledge about Dynapack hub dynos.
Again, I wouldn't take offence to questions about any data you post. But dotting your 'i's and crossing your 't's wouldn't hurt.