View Single Post
Old 03-25-2016, 03:44 PM   #15
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
More importantly, Nissan doesn't have another manufacturer it can simply build the car at, considering Toyota has zero production capacity committed to the 86.

All things considered, Nissan most likely is finding a more profitable car to build with their existing capacity.

-alex
Not true, could do a shared platform with Renault reviving both the Silvia and Alpine names, they've been talking about starting the Alpine brand up again for about a decade now, although Alpines were all RR apparently, but there was talks of using the GTR for an Alpine, and the Clio was MR...

Pitching additional sales in the U.S. through badging it as a Nissan would probably help Renault justify the costs.

Agreed though, their game is econo-boxes, that's THE game if you want to thrive as an auto manufacturer these days with even Ferrari and Lamborghini talking about SUV's since it was such a boon for Porsche. Mass market big sales numbers line executive pockets and give shareholders dividends, not raving magazine reviews that move ~20k sports cars at thin profit margins.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to strat61caster For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (03-25-2016)