View Single Post
Old 03-15-2016, 07:38 PM   #262
rice_classic
Senior Member
 
rice_classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Nevermorange FRS
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,174
Thanks: 757
Thanked 4,208 Times in 1,808 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
Bull! There is no more strain put on a clutch by downshifting then there is up shifting. Not sure when this myth came about but believe it coincides with the invention of the internet. The clutch is designed to do both not just one.
I think the difference isn't in the function, but in the application and in the application of the average driver.

Most folks aren't rev matching or double clutching, therefore on a downshift the clutch is speeding up an engine, whereas on an upshift it's slowing it down. The friction disk is being applied to retard or accelerate what is essentially a compressor. The requirement in force to slow down an off-throttle engine is much less than to accelerate one.

To compound this, on a down shift, the clutch re-engagement is generally slower for your typical driver so the delta between where the revs are when the clutch is disengaged to where the revs are when the clutch is re-engaged is greater, aka: even more work.
__________________
SCCA T4 - FRS
rice_classic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rice_classic For This Useful Post:
Riftur (03-15-2016), Ultramaroon (03-15-2016), _Kodiak (04-05-2020)