Quote:
Originally Posted by extrashaky
No, I reason that they're in denial by their reaction to differing opinions. Because as I said above, if it's purely for your own enjoyment, it doesn't matter what I think and there's no reason to whine about it. I'm sure there are people with canards who would read this and say, "Meh, who cares what that guy thinks," and move on. By posting so many times and with such passion, you're demonstrating with every post that you do care what other people think.
It's your car. Do what you want with it. It will still look silly.
|
You also said above anyone who claims they did it for their own enjoyment is in denial because everyone actually thinks their car looks stupid. Which doesn't make sense. If they said everyone thinks their car looks good, then they would be in denial. You also argued that canards are non functional, which is incorrect. And that everyone thinks canards look dumb, which again is obviously incorrect or no one would buy them. I've seen several cars with them, some of those see the track, others, I dunno, I didn't ask. "Most"people life aggressive looking cars, there is a reason the newer Priuses look the way they do. Market research is telling Toyota that people in their target market are more inclined to buy it if it looks more aggressive, therefore I hypothesize that it is in fact a majority of people who think canards look good, the opposite of your statement. Maybe the elitists don't like them, maybe even a majority of enthusiasts. But if you want to argue straight numbers of people who approve/disapprove, I'm confident in my standing