Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFisty
Sorry for the poor spelling again, guys. I don't know why that happens. My phone uses autocorrect here, too, so even when I mistype things, I don't understand how that happens...
But yeah, I have to agree with you. And I think I saw someone hating on the FRS for being called a sports car. I don't think a lot of people really get the idea of a sports car, I feel like.
Why no regular GT, though? I think if you pick up one that's one or two years old, it's totally worth the dough. I would have bought one if I could have afforded it, but the FRS was far more budget friendly.
Personally, I hope to V8 swap it one day. Mwuhahahaha.
|
Eh, only GT i'd own are the new ones... Or a 1969 mach 1..
I test drove one of the new GT's and I wasn't all that blown away from it. It still felt like a boat, even with the new IRS it didn't seem to handle or transition well, it also had typical mustang body roll. It moves, but I expected it to do that. It's and improvement over the last gen mustangs but when I was done with the drive the guy told me they wanted 42k before taxes for that car, I told them I was no longer interested and walked out.
Too expensive and for them trying to make it feel "sportier" I still wouldnt take it to a track nor wouldn't even think about taking it to an autoX.