View Single Post
Old 02-09-2016, 08:00 AM   #10
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,798
Thanks: 2,187
Thanked 4,243 Times in 2,221 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRSBRZGT86FAN View Post
Seems extremely conflicting to me, hopefully more enthusiasts fight this. My understanding is that they're OK with fully converted cars used only on the track, but going and putting a high flow cat on them would be illegal? Looks like magnaflow, hooker and OEM cat manufacturers may take a hit and price of that jurisdiction and control of that is gonna be passed onto car enthusiast.
Yeah I think this is exactly what EPA is doing. All those companies that sell aftermarket exhausts and tunes market their products for race and non-road use only. Enthusiasts buy those parts anyway and use them on the street.

If EPA makes these parts illegal even for track-only competition cars, those companies won't have a justifiable reason to sell those parts, even under a race and non-road use designation. Basically EPA is trying to choke the supply-side.

I think EPA realizes the percentage of pollutants put out by track/competition cars is de minimis, but that's not the real motivation for this. It's a stupid proposal anyway you look at it.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DarkSunrise For This Useful Post:
FRSBRZGT86FAN (02-09-2016), strat61caster (02-09-2016), Tcoat (02-09-2016), Toyarzee (02-09-2016)