Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike
That's not a FA20...
|
So? Based on analytical data comparing a dynojet and what you think are actually legitimate #'s off a sky high dynapack, that C30-94 would be 480-490. There's your C30 making absurd numbers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPCorBUST
Your ignorance knows no bounds, and the only thing higher than these numbers is your level of arrogance.
Hat tip to you for the afternoon laugh, it was welcome.
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
|
Coming from the guy with his fuzzy math logic... doesn't mean much.
Same all motor car.
Church Dynapack
My dynapack
351/304 = 1.15. So for this specific case, that dyno was 15% higher than mine, there goes that "all dynapacks read 10% high".... lol