View Single Post
Old 01-12-2016, 06:38 PM   #614
Captain Snooze
Because compromise ®
 
Captain Snooze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Red Herring
Location: australia
Posts: 7,819
Thanks: 4,050
Thanked 9,556 Times in 4,196 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaoskaze View Post
Ya, I thought lots car company talked about being 50/50 with their cars but I don't know the history with BMW on this.

Mind shed a light over here?
I don't know where the 50/50 thing originated but I am guessing it has its roots back in the automotive dark ages.

I suspect BMW has painted themselves into a corner. That is, they have to maintain the charade.
"Well-balanced weight distribution is the basis for neutral self-steering properties, high agility and good traction even with heavy loads."
They are saying 50/50 is great but then you can go and stuff it up with heavy loads.
"Every kilo saved represents a measurable increase in agility and safety. You’ll feel it in every curve: evenly-distributed weight means increased driving pleasure." Given how heavy BMWs are now days this seems contradictory.
"This, combined with the Dynamic Stability Control (DSC),". But we will throw in electronic control just to be sure.
From http://www.bmw.com/com/en/insights/t...tribution.html

Weight distribution is one factor in a dynamic package. Steering geo, suspension layout, tyre width, aero considerations all affect handling dynamics. To say that weight distribution is the key element in design is just false.
__________________
My car is completely stock except for all the mods.

Captain Snooze is offline   Reply With Quote