View Single Post
Old 12-27-2015, 02:18 AM   #827
makinen
Senior Member
 
makinen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: South Korea
Posts: 278
Thanks: 138
Thanked 221 Times in 126 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by solidONE View Post
Looks pretty damn good. MafV goes as high as 4.13v which is as much as I've seen with my catless headers/stock airbox setup in cold weather. AFR look good except where LTFT was subtracting fuel at the lower range. Not too bad though. With a log looking like this I would not hesitate adding .5 or a degree of timing in the entire range. I'm sure there is a little more power on the table.

But that pull doesn't look like a good candidate to convert to dynograph with a lot of little dips and spikes in the rpm. I like to use 2 smoothing on virtual dyno.
http://datazap.me/u/makinenkr/201512...66-92-97-86-73

I would suggest doing many back to back pulls on a nice and flat/level surface to get good/consistent data for conversion. At least 3-4 pulls. I do about 10 in a row then a 3to4to5 gear at the end for good measure and good data to see if you can add or pull some timing for better power or knock resistance
Thanks for your comment.
Interesting point is, if I advance one cell by 0.350 at 2800RPM certain point IAM drops to 0.88.
Fortunately over 6800RPM, I can advance one or two clicks from above logged data so more flattened power output at those high area.

Edit:
After adding some ign advance to the high RPM and got FLKC -0.65 from 7343RPM just before retarding by the ign map.
http://datazap.me/u/makinenkr/201512...7-112&mark=107

For the Virtual Dyno graphs, smoothing works great! In my cases, smoothing 3 is more realistic I think.

Last edited by makinen; 12-27-2015 at 08:56 AM.
makinen is offline   Reply With Quote