Quote:
Originally Posted by mhughett
The S54 engine was designed about 15 years ago and required very expensive valve adjustments every 40-50k miles. It is also a little bit of a gas-hog with EPA ratings of 15-22. I took it to the track a couple of times and it's a little scary at times. I found the BRZ to be much more predictable and easier to throw into corners without worrying about the ass-end of the car coming around when you least expect it.
|
It would be daft to imply the S54 is a lesser engine or less engaging than the FA20. It exudes nearly double the HP/tq and has more character (history too) than the FRS power-plant, plus a higher redline. Yes, its an old BMW with a more expensive price tag and thereby maintenance costs. It's scarier on the track because things approach at much higher speeds, period. I will agree that the FR-S seating position and neutral balance boosts driver confidence, still getting used the wayyy back position of the /M.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhughett
On the interior, the gauges seem out of place and cheap compared to the rest of the car. The trunk space is tight and there is no rear seat to fold down to expand its space. Nappa Leather seats are nice but the twins seats were much more supportive.
In summary, I think the Z4M coupe is one of the best looking cars BMW has ever done but I haven't looked back since selling it nearly 3 years ago. While the BRZ doesn't have the panache of the BMW, I think it is more fun to drive on a day-in, day out basis.
|
Spot on with the gauges, the stack layout on the FR-S/BRZ is better. The seats are body type dependent, but I don't find either to be an issue.
As a daily-driver its a lot more fun than my FR-S, I will admit that the FR-S was easier to row through the gears at legal speeds. As with any older performance car, you'll give up some of the modern comforts and cheap maintenance of the FRS