View Single Post
Old 12-18-2015, 01:45 PM   #72
fumanchu1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Drives: 2013 Brz C38 (bought not built :P)
Location: Gatineau, Qc, Canada
Posts: 1,914
Thanks: 422
Thanked 1,249 Times in 802 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eighty 6 View Post
Metal or sediments are heavier than fuel right? So as long as tank remains relatively full its not really a prob, but when you drive it with your fuel light on you risk some of that residue contaminating your fuel line. Off topic. Take itto the shotstorm thread
That makes no sense, re-read this and tell me that your logic isn't flawed.


How exactly is it that the fuel level would be the only deciding factor. If your argument is well the low fuel causes the residue to be able to rise to a max of 1-3 inches and that's where the residues are grabbed by the pump. My answer to that moronic statement would be that even if the fuel tank is full, that zone where residues may be prone to enter the fuel system is still filled with fuel so from a physics standpoint it would be impossible for you to claim that the entirety of the residues could not at some point be exactly where they would be in a almost empty tank.
-=fuel
+=residue
empty:+--+


Full: +-+-+-+-+-+


See how even in the full tank there would still be residues floating at the 3inch mark or the 2 inch mark whether fuel is full or not will not affect the presence of residue it can only affect the concentration of said residue in a specific zone. Therefore all your points are invalid and your arguments do not stand. Sorry, try again.
fumanchu1 is offline