View Single Post
Old 12-03-2015, 01:04 PM   #172
thambu19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 79 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
OK if trims gone positive then its adding fuel to compensate when we switched in heaps more port , so we assume the port injectors were not adding as much fuel as the directs did.

So I think we need to make ports add more fuel.

In a petrol tune Inj scale BRZ (port) is 228
In a E85 tune its 171

So looks like lower number means more fuel.
Shiv added roughly 30% more fuel in E85 tunes so it looks like if we moved the injector scalar 2 it would equate to roughly 1% change in port fueling.

So if we want to add more fuel as the trims have gone up say +4% we need to move scalar down roughly 8. Its not going to be exact as we did not go from 0 port to 100% port but should be in the ballpark.

I would not go wildly adjusting the scalar though.

To do it correctly you would have to go 100% direct (whole map) make sure trims are good, then switch to 100% port and adjust scalar to get it as close as possible to what you got trim wise with 100% direct.
Why do they not react appropriately when we change ratios. With more pfi the ecu should have added the right amount of pulse width I would assume

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
thambu19 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thambu19 For This Useful Post:
solidONE (12-03-2015), steve99 (12-03-2015)