View Single Post
Old 11-27-2015, 02:48 PM   #18
Shiv@Openflash
Senior Member
 
Shiv@Openflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,629
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 5,470 Times in 1,494 Posts
Mentioned: 605 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thambu19 View Post
@Shiv@Openflash
Your work is a piece of art. Total respect. I do have a question though. Why did you guys decide to keep the torque bump at 4800rpm? Since it is only a bump occurring at a short stretch of rpms most OEMs would have sliced it off to protect engine HW from peak cylinder pressures mostly because the torque isn't sustained over a larger engine speed.
The FA20 can handle way more power loads that we could ever achieve through sound naturally aspirated tuning. So with that in mind, our goal was to maximize torque at every RPM point. The OFH was designed to maximize average torque in the 4500-7500rpm range since this is where you run the engine when running aggressively through the gears. That extra bump in torque between 4500-5000rpm feels really nice when you grab the next gear. The tradeoff is the inverse dip centered at 3800rpm. But it's high enough that it's not felt during normal driving (2500-3500rpm) and low enough that it never comes into play when you rowing through the gears for max acceleration. Much of the dip could be subjectively "removed" by reducing torque bump in the 4000-5000rpm range but what's the fun in making a car slower?
Shiv@Openflash is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Shiv@Openflash For This Useful Post:
DAEMANO (12-01-2015), iJeff (11-27-2015), Koa (04-12-2016), MisterSheep (04-01-2016), thambu19 (11-27-2015)