View Single Post
Old 06-07-2012, 03:43 AM   #22
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
I did, and I asked arghx7 about it, and he confirmed my suspicions. Direct injection simply needs some sort of charge motion to get it working well, port injectors are less picky since you can just vaporize the fuel on the valve. The port injectors aren't supposed to run big duty cycles though, so that suggests they still needed to design some degree of tumble flow into the ports, however that works.

The paper didn't say D4-S was to break the compromise, rather it described the flow compromise that a DI engine sees, the efficiency disadvantage that port injection has, and then they went on and talked about their new engine, without actually saying what they did to the ports.
They didn't do anything to them. Basically they were normal without SCVs choking them and the cutouts that increase tumble in the 3GRFSE.

The purpose of the Yamaha developed double fan spray pattern is
Quote:
to promote a homogeneous mixture at lower engine speeds without any devices to generate intense air motion to improve combustion stability.
Quote:
With the developed spray, this test engine can improve at all engine speeds even though tumble is weaker without a SCV.
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote