View Single Post
Old 11-23-2015, 05:35 PM   #318
Dr Speed
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: Red
Location: Canada
Posts: 48
Thanks: 3
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaguirre123 View Post
if the average 210 whp that you quoted is accurate then Celek's build is promising because the increased displacement to 2.3 fa20 motor will have a higher whp due to fr-s/brz are rear wheel drive cars. I am assuming of course that the N/A engines that you mentioned are installed in an AWD cars.


my predicted assumption of higher HP result was based on youtube video, by /DRIVE, of Crawford stating that for the same turbo the EJ made 360hp vs. FA20 made 430hp. that's a 19.44% difference. if we apply the 19.44% on 210whp, that's 251whp.


am I correct on my assumption? I sure hope Crawford is not blowing smoke.

no that was rwhp in my build. You are bench racing. Math and reality are not necessarily the same thing, and a manufactuer is more likely to inflate numbers for marketing, advertising and sales. Also Turbo potential hp figures vs N/A number potential is not equal. I'd divide your 19.44% by 2 or more realistically.
Dr Speed is offline   Reply With Quote