Yeah, it falls under that, and it also contradicts what Mazda reps have stated publicly. For the NC, it was Bilsteins, same springs, different rear sway bar. For the ND, Mazda has said it's the opposite -- the springs are different on the Club, but the rear sway bar is the same.
You can find specs on the stock spring rates for past generations, so I figure it's only a matter of time until we know what the ND has.
Actually, I went back and checked that thread:
http://forum.miata.net/vb/showpost.p...3&postcount=71
The Sport (and presumably GT) rates were measured at 156/80, and the Club at 150/100, and I assume that's lb/in. The measurements were taken by two different people with probably different equipment, so likely the front rates are the same and it's the rears that have gotten 20% stiffer or thereabouts. That makes sense given Mazda's commentary that they changed the springs instead of the rear sway bar.
I would be more inclined to agree if there were a major difference. Maybe the Bilsteins are that much better than the base (heh, I almost wrote "stock" there

) shocks, I dunno. I wouldn't mind being proven wrong if ever a journalist decides to test both, might make my decision of which trim to get a little easier.
