|
I have no dog in this fight, but the argument really boils down to this.
The prices of the cars as tested were the same and neither model was base so arguably that makes it a fair comparison.
Where people start to disagree is that for the FRS/BRZ, the option package was a purely cosmetic one while the Miata added performance options.
Since the comparison for the cars was on track times then it doesn't make sense to add performance upgrades to one and cosmetic options to the other since that skews the comparison.
I sense that at this point there will be no convincing either side.
|