View Single Post
Old 11-01-2015, 03:50 AM   #36
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,633 Times in 1,113 Posts
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
Their is no real advantage in doing so unless you want to see knock easily using the KCS value. ie if its flat any deviation is knock. But be have FBKC and FLKC parameters to see knock much easier.

although that KCA table looks like a random array of numbers I suspect the subaru engineers designed it that way to allow more knock correction to take place in knock prone areas when IAM drops. and/or drop the timing larger amount in certain areas as IAM correction acts on KCA values only.
This is very true. You don't really want the IAM to reduce timing at lower load, just let FBKC take care of that. If you want a flatter advance table so that the base timing is easier to read then I would suggest keeping the values in each load column the same and increase them as the load increases. Mine goes from 0 to 5/6 degrees, use the stock table as a guide

You can use my timing adjust tool to play around.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post:
solidONE (11-01-2015)