Quote:
Originally Posted by FRStock
Engine:
The sound is way better than expected, especially in tunnels. Seriously, I love the sound of the flat-6. Youtube videos don't tell the whole story. Boxster sounds exotic and we all know what an FRS sounds like, even with aftermarket exhaust. Having the engine in the back and the intakes behind the doors spoils the driver, it's hard to get that sound out of a front-engine car.
|
Sound-wise, Porsche fans will also miss a lot with the new 4-cylinder turbo engine. It is where things are going and in fact FRS/BRZ is already there! Today's engines have to consider also other things like fuel consumption, CO2 levels and to pass other emission standards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRStock
Handling:
I didn't get a chance to track it so can't compare other than it feels much sharper with less body roll. Compared to a stock FRS, the suspension is firmer but the seats are much better so it doesn't feel bad at all.
|
Too bad. That would be the most interesting comparison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRStock
Summary:
I always thought the FRS/BRZ is 90% of a Boxster/Cayman but I am completely wrong. Boxster/Cayman is out of the twins' league, it's not fair to compare these two. The sound, the awesome PDK, the interior quality, and just the overall experience is several times better than when in an FRS. They are completely different cars and it's not fair to compare the two.
|
Porsche brand is targeting the high premium level. FRS/BRZ is not targeting this level, but like it or not it was designed in comparison to Boxster/Cayman. Not the current model, but the first generation. In some levels FRS/BRZ was in fact better (e.g. handling).