Quote:
Originally Posted by DAEMANO
I think I lost a tad HP due to the very hot and humid conditions today (85+ degrees and 70% humidity) and I totally forgot to clean my drop in filter (it's been 2 years now, ugh). So perhaps another 5-10 WHP tops in better conditions with a clean filter. I think it's safe to say that a TQ24V 2.0 will get 225 WHP and 205 WTQ on e85 in normal conditions. Remember, this is running Shiv's super safe daily driver tune and not a "dyno queen" tune that gives up safety to get a good number on the dyno. Sojhinn's previous e85 dyno was roughly the same.
Most important here are the nature of the power curves, area under the curve and the kind of driving character it makes. Which is to say fun. Still if a comparison is needed there was a JRSC Stg 1 CARB tuned for CA91 car that pulled 252 WHP and 198 WTQ today. The cost to put that together was substantial. Importantly that car was setup for something else entirely (track focused, fully caged) but the Phantom's 223 WHP and 207 WTQ compares favorably for the street and especially for the price and lack of complexity. Yup yup. 
223 WHP / 207 WTQ - Me today
223 WHP / 200 WTQ - Sojhinn
@ LucidMomentum I typically add 16.5% to get a crank equivalent for BHP and 12.5% for TQ this car so ballpark should be 260 WHP / 232 WTQ. I know this is not incredibly scientific, but it seems to work out when looking at the performance of similar p/w ratio RWD MT cars.
 |
I agree with the heat probably effecting perdormance. Good point i was at the track here in florida losing 2-3 mph on my trap speed in 90F, 70%.
So on 93 e10 expext what about 210-215whp ?
Still curious on the 1/4 performance seems like only 1 person has done it...