View Single Post
Old 08-13-2015, 02:16 PM   #50
MGPAX
Still 17!
 
MGPAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2014 Silver BRZ Limited
Location: HIGHLANDS, NC.
Posts: 162
Thanks: 121
Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
I wouldn't be so happy with that alignment. The rear toe would bother me.

More front negative camber would help your rotation issues as well, even on stock tires.

EDIT: I'm also not sure what you mean by "Is this just odd or is rear toe always measured from the
back of the car?...as is reverse of front?"

- Andrew
*This alignment check is the first one since buying the car over a year ago. I thought it was pretty good for stock after over a year of sliding around!

Thanks for your input. And the rear toe is what I'm talking about.
The little picture next to the setting is saying that a positive number is
actually taken at the rear of the rear wheel (rear of wheel's distance from center) thus it is actually toe IN. (Which I always thought was a negative number)
Am I right?

The Whteline top hats have a .5 degree setting to add neg camber. But I thought with all the caster on this car I may be over doing it if I add more camber also. You think I should add the camber also?

Thanks for your input!
MGPAX is offline   Reply With Quote