View Single Post
Old 08-10-2015, 08:47 PM   #64
spitfire481
Senior Member
 
spitfire481's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2JZ FRS
Location: Pure Automotive Performance
Posts: 1,378
Thanks: 97
Thanked 1,354 Times in 621 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travisty75 View Post
Not trying to be a ****head about this, but they're saying 690BHP, not WHP. Assuming a low 10% parasitic loss, we're still talking low 620-630whp. A more acceptable 15% loss puts us around your WHP level. So technically.. You could have the worlds most powerful setup on EcuTek if you went off BHP ratings, too.
I highly doubt they have an engine on an actual engine dyno, so I'm not sure how many % they are adding to the bhp number they got. Good eye, I didn't even notice the bhp vs whp discrepancy. I'm also curious on the full fuel setup on this car. We have pushed the stock return-less system to the limit and had to convert to go any further than 550 safely.
__________________
Pure Automotive Performance
MoTeC
Build Thread
@spitfire481

Last edited by spitfire481; 08-13-2015 at 05:00 PM.
spitfire481 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to spitfire481 For This Useful Post:
Shit Luck (08-13-2015)