View Single Post
Old 08-08-2015, 05:46 AM   #623
akyp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2012 86
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 303
Thanks: 560
Thanked 116 Times in 65 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
The Miata's soft suspension gives it a lot of dynamic camber, simply put off the showroom floor it's working it's tires better than the 86 I would suspect but we won't know until guys start measuring their factory alignments (mine was garbage at -0.3 degrees camber up front), definite points for the I4+double wishbone but that's a setup that requires more effort to refine as grip gets added, we will see how the Miata guys handle that over the next few years.
Different approaches to the problem I see. I'm still not sure if the flat-4 is worth the tradeoff (worse F/R distribution and struts). And as said it'd be interesting to see what is the next move by Toyota/Subaru. Any weight loss would be nice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
I'm still on OEM suspension on my FR-S with Dunlop Direzza ZII Star Specs and it's doing marvelously after getting the alignment improved, it wallows a bit in the front hurting my slalom but that can be fixed with a swaybar, although I'm considering picking up some BRZ front struts as they are stiffer springs. And per the tire tests mentioned
, the 86 picks up a ton of time with sticky 200TW tires without any problems with the handling, and again, I believe that is BECAUSE of the low c.g. facilitated by the boxer engine.

I'm on the same tires actually and my problems are with braking at higher speeds. I think the rears are unloaded too much due to weight transfer. I'll see if that can be fixed with some rear toe-in.
akyp is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to akyp For This Useful Post:
strat61caster (08-08-2015)