View Single Post
Old 08-06-2015, 02:32 PM   #535
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,383
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAEMANO View Post
No instead they would get an NA-NC, or 86 for thousands less and be faster.
This is really the only argument you guys have to stand on, for the same absolute budget an 86 will be faster if you are willing to upgrade the car, and so will other older cars, many of which end up faster than an 86.

But goddamn you guys are absurd to call this test not fair, I go out to buy a sports car for $25-$30k and Mazda has a faster offering off the showroom floor, period. So far two magazines agree and only internet posters disagree.

Does it matter? Well we've posted 25 pages about it so it's hard to argue it doesn't at this point...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to strat61caster For This Useful Post:
Entroper (08-06-2015), totopo (08-06-2015)