|
All dynos read different. That's well known fact. Unless there is stock baseline, against which one can see relative improvement, dyno runs hardly can be compared between them to roughly guesstimate expected performance gains for listed setups. (Yeah, i know of very possible other variables skewing results, like air temp/humidity/pressure and so on, but at very least i'd want to see as very minimum different dyno reading error somewhat lessened by request of baseline, so to compare for example relative 10% gain vs 20% gain, not whp/wtq on dyno that is vaguely described as 'reading low' or 'reading high' if mentioned at all vs another unknown reading dyno).
|