View Single Post
Old 07-18-2015, 10:04 PM   #7
mike_ekim1024
Senior Member
 
mike_ekim1024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Argento Scion FR-S
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 462
Thanks: 393
Thanked 178 Times in 107 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
I've been working on a new watch face, RPM, and thought I'd ask for some feedback.

There are many ways to represent time on a tach - a true tach with realistic numbers (screenshot), or easier to read - 0 - 6 tach for mins, and 0 - 120 mph for hours. But I feel the 0 - 6 although easier to reed, feels like a Volvo and is not "sporty".

I could also swap the tach and speedo, the tach going to 12 like a bike, but then the mins go to ?.

Last, I tried just one dial as the hours - the screenshot where 9, 10, and 11 are unmarked, but that's just confusing. Unless I show those missing numbers marks only when needed.

Thoughts? Do you like more practical but less accurate simulating a tach? Or a realistic tach that simulates a clock?

In the end, I could always provide options for a few variations, but I can't create them all.

Thanks!
Attached Images
 
mike_ekim1024 is offline   Reply With Quote