Quote:
Originally Posted by churchx
How about individual higher sampling rates per each monitored setting where it's needed, and slower ones (or dropping redundant subintervals data) where it's not?
Or .. in future OFT models wifi NAS mount or usb external storage for saving big loads of detailed full logs at less space-limited elsewhere?
|
There is a lot of things that can be done with regards to the datalogging code. But it's a tradeoff between time constraints more than anything else. We have an ever-growing To Do list which means that we need to prioritize updates carefully. As for storage capacity, there is plenty of it on the OFT. It is in the viewing/plotting domain where huge files become more a problem due to wait times.