View Single Post
Old 05-29-2012, 10:11 AM   #14
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pseud0logik View Post
So either the car is over-rated or it has 17%-18% drivetrain loss.

I'd like to see more baseline numbers after 500+ miles and an oil change.
This dyno looks to be on-par with everyone elses baseline dyno on low-mileage cars. You can reasonably expect a few more HP in a couple thousand miles, but nothing to write home about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prava View Post
I know the specs say that the car is 200whp at 7000rpm... But I don't entirely understand how a dyno works entirely. Is it a 3rd gear pull to a certain rpm/mph? Can somebody explain it simply? And also, simply why its not pulling towards the 200whp zone rather than 164.7whp?
Just a correction: OEM's advertise engine power in crank horsepower, typically done to SAE J1349 [or J2723]. However, OEM's also typically bias their advertising lower than actual in anticipation of a certain engine-build tolerance range at the factory. This is intended to ensure even poorly broken-in engines with on-edge tolerances will make advertised power. OEM's can also bias the advertised number to play games with other brands.

Wheel or hub horsepower measured on a chassis dyno is subject to drivetrain losses and will of course read lower. Getting hung up on the actual number isn't relevant; chassis dynos are best used as comparative tools where you're making back-to-back changes on the same car on the same dyno.

If you want a "real" number, remove your engine from the car and put it in an engine dyno cell and run it according to the SAE methods.
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products.
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote