View Single Post
Old 05-11-2015, 07:26 PM   #43
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,099 Times in 3,030 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaden View Post
It doesn't HAVE TO BE WRITTEN...

You obviously DON'T get it. It doesn't have to be written in the VC for that to be an unlawful application. It is inherent in our justice system and the way it is supposed to work.

To have a law (VC) that allows them to cite you for something that is contingent upon another citation that has not resulted in a conviction is adherent to the very core of what our justice system is supposed to represent (i.e. innocent until proven guilty).

Jaden
So the law was written wrong and should be corrected.

How is this a power tripping issue with the officer? If anything, blame the state legislature and CalTrans... to just blame the person applying the law is the wrong way to resolve this.

I get it perfectly fine and I had no issues with it.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote