Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178
If you must know:
I got 1 ticket in May 2004. I got the exact same ticket the week after (even before I had a chance to get the case documented in court and get my bail info in the mail).
When I informed the officer that I already got a ref ticket, the officer ignored the first ticket and wrote me up for a different vehicle code, which was 27156(f):
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/di...le=27150-27159
At the end of the day, I got 1 ref ticket (dismissed after parts were put back to stock) and the second ticket was thrown out since the first ticket wasn't even registered in the system yet and I understood my rights.
-alex |
a cop is not a judge and jury, that law is invalid. You have to have your day in court, we are supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty.
Just because a cop CLAIMS that your exhaust is inadequate is not a valid reason to force you to change it at all until it is proven that your exhaust is inadequate, there's another thing I would fight all the way to the grave.
AS was proven in my case. My exhaust was proven by the bar to be adequate, the cop was WRONG...
The idea that a ticket can be written and then before you even get your day in court to be proven to be guilty, you can be cited for not changing what may have not even been a violation in the first place is ridiculous.
I'm getting incensed now at some of the things I'm reading.
The ref that tested my car brought it to redline and left it there for several seconds to even get the car to read as loud as it did, something I almost never do.
Jaden