Quote:
Originally Posted by DocWalt
Yeah, that's what I figured with wanting the MAF scaling to be closest. I just didn't like the idea of a massive dip in the MAF scale. I did CL then OL in one go, which resulted in the big dip which I manually smoothed.
I'm working from OFT Stage 2 UEL 91 Octane v2.063. I remember seeing the open loop fueling additive, I think. I'm not at home so I'll have to try that tonight.
Thanks for the help so far!
|
How did you do both in one go? Is there any chance your ranges overlapped causing the dip? By that I mean scale one, copy that scale into the other part of the tool and then run that. If so, if you don't use the Mac/min voltage settings, then you'll get skewed results around the change over regions.
I do mine manually rather than the tool these days, find it more reliable and will take into account everything if you can sort the data.