View Single Post
Old 05-22-2012, 01:38 AM   #1379
Vracer111
Senior Member
 
Vracer111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: '13 Nissan Frontier (4.0L 6spd 2WD)
Location: In the desert...
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,246 Times in 669 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
I feel exactly the same way about those two wheels. 17 X 8 17.3 lbs PF01s look much better but it's hard to argue with the 17 X 8 RPF1's 15.6 lbs... Also the Star Specs in 235/40R17 is 24lbs.

(Weights from Tire Rack.)
Same thing for me, I really like the looks of the PFO1's the best...but being nearly 2 lbs heavier each compared to the RPF1's is not acceptable.

Unsprung weight is key and I want to maximize the cars potential without spending a lot - so I think I would be happy with 17x8 RPF1's and a 21lb or lighter tire Max Performance Summer Tire. Since really going for daily driver, don't want R-compound level grip and am actually looking at the 215/45-17 Kumho Ecsta Sport LE's for $99 each with $50 rebate. Just got a 205/55-16 set mounted on 16x7.5 Kosei K-1's for my Tacoma and am really happy with them so far after a few hundred miles. Doesn't have the dry grip of Hankook R-S3's but is about on par with the older R-S2's (like the Kumho MX's) and have better wet traction than both the Hankooks. I'm actually amazed with the wet traction of these tires... in a truck with 1/4 fuel tank level it just grips when turning and cuts right through standing water all while feeling planted. Not quite 'Subaru AWD planted' like R-S3's in the wet on my brothers Impreza RS though...but the most planted of any tire I've had on my Tacoma in the wet (BFG KDW, Falken Azenis RT-215, Kumho Ecsta MX, Hankook R-S2 & R-S3).

Last edited by Vracer111; 05-22-2012 at 01:57 AM.
Vracer111 is offline   Reply With Quote