View Single Post
Old 11-11-2010, 08:25 PM   #222
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,053
Thanks: 7,730
Thanked 19,281 Times in 8,389 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneday View Post
I know you are late to this debate, but it was not said or implied that the tC was appropriate for X-Games or rally cross (though there were two Miatas running last weekend and doing pretty good and a Civic Si and a Mazda3 made it to the 2WD A-Main). I can turn your argument around and say, "but you don't see any STIs in NASCAR, do you?" Not really the right car for the series, is it? Within the SCCA Pro WC series the DGR tC is in a different class than the STI because the STI has more horsepower, a different drivetrain and is generally a higher performance car.

I've never said the STI was not faster than the tC. The STI is an all around better performance car out of the box. Unfortunately your points lack pointiness.
Is there a late and early in the debates? Can leave or come anytime in online thread, thank you.

Yes, you're right that Subaru isn't in the NASCAR. I'm no NASCAR expert or anything, but how's Nissan doing in NASCAR? Oh wait, THEY'RE NOT IN THERE! How about Mazda? Honda? iirc Toyota finally got in there lil while back (and they're doing great). I think you chose wrong example there. Subaru/STI is in JGTC, WRC (was), TA, Auto-X, Drift, I would say almost all the area of racing (except F1 & NASCAR). What I meant to say is, while you are praising tC blah blah blah, the fact still remain tC is limited to certain area of racing other hand STI is all over the racing world (almost all).

Is that good enough point for ya or is that still a pointless? Oh wait, debating about tC itself is pointless... never mind, keep going w your debate.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote