View Single Post
Old 03-25-2015, 02:31 PM   #2533
renfield90
The Stig's German cousin
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,071
Thanks: 140
Thanked 519 Times in 345 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tahdizzle View Post
Why would you asume that?

The only way the RS really differs from any other FR-S is the springs, sways, and aero.

So adding everyone adding everthing but the Aero from a RS wouldn't prompt the SEB to consider bumping a FR-S to B Street, but instead moving numerous cars around to accomodate the FR-S remaining in C Street?

Edit:
Or the other option of maintaining the status quo, and essentially allowing a RS in C-Street.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrqlessWonder View Post
This is street class autocross. Logic is a far from guaranteed.
This. The problem is we have a rule saying "you can use any standard part" and a somewhat liberal definition for what a standard part is, but we don't have a rule saying explicitly "you can't change springs." If we were required to run the springs the car physically came with, this goes away.

The adage is "if it doesn't say you can, then you can't" but the definition of standard part lets you do a lot. There's good reasons for it being so open, but it might be worthwhile to explicitly pare this back.
renfield90 is offline   Reply With Quote