[pantdino]

Originally Posted by GWiZ

They were denying the claim due to a missing oil change that was done but apparently never documented Subaru. Thus questions whether it was done or done wrong. There was no leak, no signs of burning, etc. No heavy modifications added either.

The determining factor they didn't want to battle and agreed to settle was the fact the oil light never came on. Not when there was a little missing, a lot missing, or no oil period. I have proof from a reputable shop regarding that as well.

So new motor it is!

How much oil was in the engine?

Isn't this "low oil" the same story as the engines with the ruined 4th bearings caused by the cam advance mechanism failure?

Was the cam advance mechanism OK in your car?

I usually do my own oil changes, but with this car the $tealer changes might be worth it.