View Single Post
Old 02-17-2015, 06:08 PM   #124
Koa
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: '02 RA Bugeye | '15 FRS
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,876
Thanks: 2,291
Thanked 1,488 Times in 788 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by industrial View Post
U BETRA SHUT UR MOUF OR IM KICK UR AZZ. OMG SO MAD RITE NOW. IM MMA FIGHTER I WILL MES U UP!!!!111111!!!!! :mad0 260:

Seriously? What are we 12?
I just don't get it.. Stu and zaric laid out in VERY solid math and logic why claims of this driveshaft reporting back any noticeable improvement to lap times/power is a pretty much closed case example of butt dyno trickery more than anything.

At the end of the day, the rotational weight savings does MINISCULE amounts of gain over the equivalent sprung amount... soooo much so, that realistically, no appreciable gain in lap time or performance to, in their opinion, warrant the $400 spent.

Notice the bold is where the facts stop and opinion starts. How aligned one is to that opinion is open to debate. In my opinion, that $400 can be used for MUCH better purposes, if on a budget. If a dude(tte) really is looking to spent more money on his car, and already has a full header system/tune/brakes/whatever... fuck. go for it!

but if he/she does and comes here to try and exclaim how amazing it is, and how they can definitely tell, etc... don't expect the people who understand the real forces at work to hold their tongue.
Koa is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Koa For This Useful Post:
cdrazic93 (02-18-2015), funwheeldrive (09-30-2016), Manic (02-17-2015)