Quote:
Originally Posted by Malt
We can argue over semantics if you'd like and obviously my example was a poor one, but the point still stands. Focusing on a single data point (Peak WHP) when looking at a dyno chart is neither productive or a true representation of the actual tune. As for your "correction factor", I have no idea how accurate it is and its not really the point. Its a number that has math applied to it to simulate what the results would be on a different make of dyno. Perhaps the better solution to the community is to focus more on HP gained over stock and area under the curve gained. The education process needs starts with the vendors rather than acquiescing to the desires of the uninformed consumer. Maybe some effort could be given to this task as your results are great on their own without resorting to pseuodo math.
|
We've actually worked quite a bit on that, and have a multitude of graphs and numbers available on our website for any consumer with the desire to learn about possible gains out there.
http://www.delicioustuning.com/Stage_2_PumpGas
Complete with area under the curve gains, peak gains, drag curves, corrected power curves, ambient temps, intake temps, humidity, oil temps, even rotating mass.
We aren't hiding anything from the consumer. It's all available right here for everyone to see.
Sincerely,
Zach
Delicious Tuning