View Single Post
Old 02-17-2015, 02:21 PM   #16
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,798
Thanks: 2,187
Thanked 4,243 Times in 2,221 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxBrun0xx View Post
This is a really good idea. I bet people would be surprised by how much "area under the curve" the twins have. I would be shocked if it didn't beat the pants off the S2K and all 2.0 WRX's, which people typically consider "faster". Somebody should start a thread about this. Would be interesting.
I'm not so sure. Most of the dynos where bolt-on Twins are making ~200 whp, you see the torque rise from 6000-7000 rpm, which produces a somewhat inflated peak hp number.

The torque curves for a lot of larger displacement engines (and especially turbo engines) peak earlier in the midrange and drop off, leading to more area under the curve.

I think this is an issue for some of the Twins competing in power/weight-classed time attack series. Not enough area under the curve compared with larger displacement engines.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DarkSunrise For This Useful Post:
xxBrun0xx (03-02-2015)