View Single Post
Old 02-16-2015, 06:30 PM   #77
Tromatic
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: FR-S
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,232
Thanks: 61
Thanked 1,728 Times in 786 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRE View Post
More evidence will come, but I am not at all void of any evidence. My wing with the experimental endplate, at 120kph, makes 201.2lb lift and 49.6lb drag. In comparison, the APR GTC-200 at 130kph makes 110lb lift and 16.5lb drag. Despite the increase in drag, The huge leap in downforce will still yield results around a track much better than the APR.
Bona fides: evidence of one's qualifications or achievements —often plural in construction

So "none" then? Not a really hard question. As in tell us what gives you the background to claim that real-world tested and respected aero sucks.

ETA: Don't you have to be a registered vendor to advertise your shit like this?

ETA again: The claims get better and better, with nothing to back it up. Keep going, OP!
Tromatic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tromatic For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (02-16-2015)